Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · Industry

Technology & Software

14 decisions coded to this industry. Industry tags describe the goods or services in the dispute, not the legal ground.

All 28 industries
By du Pont factor
By posture
Non-precedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal affirmed

In re Lasertec Corporation

Because Lasertec’s GALOIS mark for semiconductor wafer inspection machines is identical to the registered GALOIS mark for cameras and scanners, and the evidence showed those products work…

79358845 · 2026-03-16 · GALOIS v. GALOIS

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd.

The Board refused registration of ZHIMA because the applicant would not add a required statement translating the word (evidence showed ZHIMA is the Chinese word for ‘sesame,’ used across…

86832288 · 2023-01-12 · ZHIMA

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re Zuma Array Limited

SMART BEZEL merely describes Zuma Array’s electronic sensor modules, which the company’s own website presents as smart bezels, so the wording cannot be registered as a brand.

79288888 · 2022-08-09 · SMART BEZEL

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd.

The Board upheld the refusal to register the plain word mark .SUCKS for domain registry and domain-name-registration services, finding that consumers see .SUCKS as just another web-address…

86700941 · 2020-10-29 · .SUCKS (standard characters)

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

In re Vox Populi Registry Ltd.

The Board also upheld the refusal to register .SUCKS shown in a retro, pixelated ‘LED display’ style font for domain registry services, finding the special lettering was too ordinary…

87187215 · 2020-10-29 · .SUCKS displayed in a stylized "font suggesting an LED display" (retro pixelated font resembling early CRT computer-screen lettering)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal affirmed

In re AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.

The Board held that .CAM (in plain text) cannot be registered even on the Supplemental Register for webcam-related business, telecommunication and entertainment services, because consumers…

85635277 · 2020-09-15 · .CAM (standard characters)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal affirmed

In re AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.

The Board held the stylized .CAM logo (green dot plus black CAM) is also unregistrable on the Supplemental Register for the same webcam-related services, because its minimal styling does…

85635287 · 2020-09-15 · .CAM design mark (the mark consists of a green period/decimal point preceding the word "CAM" in the color black; colors green and black claimed as a feature of the mark; slightly stylized script)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Katch, LLC

The USPTO’s refusal of HEALTHPLANS.COM for health insurance lead-generation and advertising services (Class 35) was upheld because the Board found that consumers would recognize the term as…

86301765 · 2019-06-20 · HEALTHPLANS.COM

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re TracFone Wireless, Inc.

The Board ruled that UNLIMITED CARRYOVER, as it appeared on TracFone’s specimen, would be seen by consumers as an informational description of a wireless-plan feature (carrying over unused…

87221529 · 2019-06-10 · UNLIMITED CARRYOVER

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Minerva Associates, Inc.

The Board sided with the applicant, finding that screenshots showing the AWLVIEW mark displayed above the login and search screens of its downloadable warehouse-management software were…

86430215 · 2018-02-12 · AWLVIEW

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

In re Solid State Design Inc.

The Board upheld the refusal to register a stylized “populace” mark with a person-silhouette design for map-based, real-time popularity-visualization software, finding it too similar to an…

87269041 · 2018-01-03 · populace (stylized, with silhouette of a person's head centered within the letter "o") v. populace (orb or ball-shaped design in alternating red/white bands, with the word "populace" below in small black letters)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Integrated Embedded (d/b/a Barr Group)

The USPTO’s refusal to register the name BARR GROUP for IT training, engineering, and expert witness services was upheld because (1) BARR GROUP is perceived primarily as a surname (the…

86140341 · 2016-09-27 · BARR GROUP (standard characters; GROUP disclaimed) v. BARR

PrecedentialLandmarkMixed — part reversed

Refusal affirmed

In re Driven Innovations, Inc.

The Board found that DOTBLOG for providing specific information as requested by customers via the Internet is merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1), because DOT is the standard…

77073701 · 2015-06-30 · DOTBLOG

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.

The Board ruled that CLOUDTV is a generic name (a mash-up of the everyday tech terms “cloud” and “TV”) for ActiveVideo’s cloud-based interactive-television software and video-on-demand…

77967395 · 2014-07-09 · CLOUDTV

Who checked this

Drafted with automated assistance. Not yet reviewed by an attorney, and this page says so until it is.