Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 86832288

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd.

Serial No. 86832288 · Decided 2023-01-12 · Other

What happened

The Board refused registration of ZHIMA because the applicant would not add a required statement translating the word (evidence showed ZHIMA is the Chinese word for ‘sesame,’ used across many of the applicant’s own and third parties' goods and services).

The marks

Applicant

ZHIMA

A wide variety of goods and services in International Classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, and 45

Why this decision is significant

Precedential application of the Trademark Rule 2.32(a)(9) translation-statement requirement: extensive third-party and applicant use of ZHIMA as the transliteration of the Chinese word for ‘sesame’ defeated the claim that the term is a coined word needing no translation.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library