Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Research library · Decisions

The decision library

178 Board decisions, each coded to a fixed schema and rewritten so a non-lawyer can follow it. The outcome is on every card, so you can rule one out without opening it. Every record also says whether its own Board docket has been checked for a later reversal or vacatur — 25 have not been, and they say so. A docket check does not show whether later cases changed the law.

All 28 industries
By du Pont factor
By posture

169–178 of 178 decisions · newest first · page 8 of 8

PrecedentialLandmarkNot checked

In re Nieves & Nieves LLC

Both Section 2(a) and Section 2(c) refusals affirmed for ROYAL KATE for fashion/luxury goods. Board applied four-part Section 2(a) false suggestion test and found all prongs satisfied…

85179263 · 2015-01-30

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal reversed

In re Thor Tech, Inc.

Even though the marks are identical, TERRAIN for towable RV trailers may register over TERRAIN for trucks because the two kinds of vehicles are fundamentally different products that careful…

85667188 · 2015-01-26 · TERRAIN (standard characters) v. TERRAIN (standard characters)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal reversed

In re Covalinski

The REDNECK RACEGIRL logo may register over RACEGIRL for overlapping clothing because the design’s giant checkerboard double-R dominates the mark and makes the wording hard even to notice.

85685983 · 2014-12-18 · REDNECK RACEGIRL and design (two large Rs with checkerboard racing flag pattern, heart shapes, colors black/white/gray) v. RACEGIRL (standard characters)

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Philips could not prove that the shape of its Sonicare toothbrush-head base assembly had come to identify Philips as the product’s source in buyers' minds, so the product-design mark was…

85092079 · 2014-09-26 · Base assembly design of electric toothbrush brushhead (product configuration)

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.

The Board ruled that CLOUDTV is a generic name (a mash-up of the everyday tech terms “cloud” and “TV”) for ActiveVideo’s cloud-based interactive-television software and video-on-demand…

77967395 · 2014-07-09 · CLOUDTV

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Datapipe, Inc.

Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal affirmed for YOUR CLOUD (standard characters) for cloud computing and data storage services. Board analyzed each component: ‘Cloud’ is common…

85173828 · 2014-07-07

PrecedentialNotableNot checked

Opposition sustained

Kristin Marie Conolty d/b/a Fairway Fox Golf v. Conolty O'Connor NYC LLC

The FAIRWAY FOX application was void from the start because the golf-clothing brand was jointly developed and owned by both former business partners, so the company controlled by just one…

Opposition No. 91206045 · 2014-07-03 · FAIRWAY FOX

PrecedentialRoutineNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re Michalko

ASSHOLE REPELLENT for a gag-gift spray can was found scandalous under the then-applicable Section 2(a) bar because dictionaries uniformly label the word vulgar, and the humorous novelty…

85584271 · 2014-05-30 · ASSHOLE REPELLENT

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Gina Davia

Section 2(d) refusal affirmed for CHANTICO design mark (stylized snake in Aztec art style with CHANTICO and PEPPER SAUCE text) for pepper sauce vs. CHANTICO (standard characters) for agave…

85497617 · 2014-05-27

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Refusal upheld

In re Hollywood Lawyers Online

HOLLYWOOD LAWYERS ONLINE primarily describes where the attorney-referral and video-directory services come from (Hollywood, California), and the entertainment-industry connotation did not…

85662420 · 2014-05-02 · HOLLYWOOD LAWYERS ONLINE

Who checked this

Drafted with automated assistance. Not yet reviewed by an attorney, and this page says so until it is.