Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 85092079

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

In re Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Serial No. 85092079 · Decided 2014-09-26 · Other

What happened

Refusal upheld — Philips could not prove that the shape of its Sonicare toothbrush-head base assembly had come to identify Philips as the product’s source in buyers' minds, so the product-design mark was denied registration.

The marks

Applicant

Base assembly design of electric toothbrush brushhead (product configuration)

Toothbrush head for electric toothbrushes (Class 21)

Why this decision is significant

Precedential opinion supplying the Board’s comprehensive framework for weighing Section 2(f) acquired-distinctiveness evidence for product-design marks — explaining why large sales figures, a cancelled prior registration, and ‘look for’ -free advertising fail to prove that a product shape functions as a mark; cited by two decisions in this database. Re-proposed with justification per the 2026-07-04 deferral.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

Non-precedentialRoutineNo later change on its docket

Applications saved by disclaimer

In re Spotlight Oral Care Limited

After the Board upheld the requirement that Spotlight Oral Care disclaim the descriptive phrase MADE BY DENTISTS in its green monster logo for toothpaste, whitening products, and…

79380381 · 2026-04-20 · MADE BY DENTISTS & design (green monster character)

Non-precedentialRoutineNo later change on its docket

Applications saved by disclaimer

In re Spotlight Oral Care Limited

After the Board upheld the requirement that Spotlight Oral Care disclaim the descriptive phrase MADE BY DENTISTS in its blue monster logo for toothpaste, whitening products, and…

79382237 · 2026-04-20 · MADE BY DENTISTS & design (blue ghost-like monster character)

Non-precedentialRoutineNo later change on its docket

Applications saved by disclaimer

In re Spotlight Oral Care Limited

After the Board upheld the requirement that Spotlight Oral Care disclaim the descriptive phrase MADE BY DENTISTS in its pink monster logo for toothpaste, whitening products, and…

79383214 · 2026-04-20 · MADE BY DENTISTS & design (pink monster character)

Non-precedentialRoutineNo later change on its docket

Applications saved by disclaimer

In re Spotlight Oral Care Limited

After the Board upheld the requirement that Spotlight Oral Care disclaim the descriptive phrase MADE BY DENTISTS in its orange monster logo for toothpaste, whitening products, and…

79384076 · 2026-04-20 · MADE BY DENTISTS & design (brown/orange monster character)

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library