Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · Cancellation No. 92079775

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

Ahal Al-Sara Group for Trading v. American Flash, Inc.

Cancellation No. 92079775 · Decided 2023-01-23 · Cancellation

What happened

Petition dismissed with leave to replead — the Board granted American Flash’s motion to dismiss because Ahal Al-Sara did not adequately plead its entitlement to bring the case or a legally sufficient fraud claim, but held the abandonment claim was properly pleaded and gave the petitioner 20 days to file an amended petition.

The marks

Applicant

AMERICAN FLASH THE ORIGINAL MADE IN USA and design (Reg. No. 3103165; mark consists of Red Banner background with the words 'American' and 'Flash' in WHITE, 'The Original' in RED, and 'Made in USA' in BLUE outline with WHITE filling; colors red, white and blue claimed; 'Made in USA' and 'American' disclaimed)

A variety of cleaning compounds in International Class 3

Petitioner's mark

FIGHTER FLASH (composite word-and-design mark; Petitioner's pleaded Saudi Arabian Trademark Application/Registration Nos. 142902232 and 142802063, no U.S. registration or application pleaded)

Among other goods, a variety of cleaning substances in International Class 3 (as identified in Petitioner's Saudi Arabian trademark filings)

Why this decision is significant

Precedential application of the Rule 12(b)(6) standard to a cancellation petition, laying out the entitlement-to-a-statutory-cause-of-action pleading requirements (Corcamore/Lexmark zone-of-interests framework), the particularity demanded of fraud claims, and the minimal pleading burden for abandonment. Interlocutory — leave to amend granted and proceeding resumed.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library