Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · Cancellation No. 92074422

PrecedentialNotableNot checked

Kimberley Kampers IP Pty Ltd v. Safiery Pty Ltd

Cancellation No. 92074422 · Decided 2022-11-02 · Cancellation

What happened

Summary judgment denied — the Board refused to cancel Safiery’s KIMBERLEY KAMPERS registration for campers on the papers, finding the ownership evidence inconclusive and the abandonment claim premature because the three-year nonuse period is measured from the application’s filing date and had not yet run, while separately ordering briefing on a nonuse theory the Board raised itself.

The marks

Applicant

KIMBERLEY KAMPERS (standard characters; Respondent's Reg. No. 5584926, registered October 16, 2018, disclaiming CAMPERS)

"campers; recreational vehicles, namely, campers" in International Class 12

Petitioner's mark

KIMBERLEY KAMPERS (standard characters; Petitioner's pleaded Application Serial No. 88952753)

"campers; recreational vehicles, namely, towable trailers; recreational vehicles, namely, campers" in International Class 12

Why this decision is significant

Precedential order confirming that for a use-based registration the three-year abandonment presumption period runs from the application filing date (following ShutEmDown Sports), and showing the Board sua sponte identifying a void-ab-initio nonuse theory from the summary-judgment record and ordering further briefing. Interlocutory — proceeding continued after this order.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library