Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 87345596

PrecedentialLandmarkNo later change on its docket

In re OEP Enterprises, Inc.

Serial No. 87345596 · Decided 2019-08-19 · Other

What happened

The Board refused to register the shape of a two-tier mesh-canopy umbrella as a trademark: the company’s own expired utility patent showed the design is functional (it vents wind), and its sales evidence — much of it under Cadillac and Lexus private labels — did not prove buyers see the shape itself as a brand.

The marks

Applicant

Product configuration mark: "a three-dimensional configuration of the goods, in the form of an umbrella with a two-tiered canopy, wherein the inner canopy consists mostly of mesh. The umbrella also has a handle, shaft, runner and ribs." Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark; the application drawing contains no broken lines.

"umbrellas; beach umbrellas; beach umbrellas; golf umbrellas; patio umbrellas," in International Class 18 (the term "beach umbrellas" is listed twice in the identification of goods)

Why this decision is significant

Precedential holding that an expired utility patent’s disclosures can standing alone prove functionality and rebut a design patent’s presumption of non-functionality; also applies the heightened product-configuration acquired-distinctiveness burden to form declarations and private-label sales.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library