Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 88308426

PrecedentialLandmarkVacated

In re Erik Brunetti

Serial No. 88308426 · Decided 2022-08-22 · Other

What happened

The Board affirmed the refusal to register FUCK (standard characters) for cell phone and laptop carrying cases, eyewear cases, spectacles and sunglasses, finding the word is such a ubiquitous, all-purpose expression - widely displayed by many third-party sellers on phone cases and similar goods - that consumers would see it as conveying a familiar sentiment rather than identifying a single source, so it fails to function as a trademark.

The marks

Applicant

FUCK (standard characters)

Carrying cases for cell phones; carrying cases specially adapted for pocket calculators, laptops and cellphones; cases adapted for mobile phones; cases for spectacles and sunglasses; cell phone cases; spectacles and sunglasses (International Class 9)

Why this decision is significant

Precedential sequel to Iancu v. Brunetti holding that the ubiquitous word FUCK fails to function as a mark across four classes, and that the failure-to-function refusal is viewpoint neutral and unaffected by the Supreme Court’s invalidation of Section 2(a)'s scandalous-matter bar. It is the leading Board authority for refusing single vulgar/expressive words as widely-used commonplace terms.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library