Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 86293054

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Jonathan Sibony

Serial No. 86293054 · Decided 2021-10-14 · Other

What happened

Refusal reversed — the Board found REPUBLIC OF LONDON for clothing is not primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, because the phrase names a place that does not exist: ‘Republic of London’ as a whole is a fanciful, incongruous composite whose primary significance is not a real geographic location.

The marks

Applicant

REPUBLIC OF LONDON (standard characters)

"belts for clothing; blazers; blouses; capris; coats; dresses; jeans; pants; pullovers; shirts; skirts; suits; sweaters; t-shirts; ties" in International Class 25

Why this decision is significant

Precedential threshold holding on the first prong of the Section 2(e)(3) test: a composite that pairs a real place name (LONDON) with an inaccurate political descriptor (REPUBLIC OF) can escape refusal because its primary significance is a fictitious place; the Board declined to dissect the mark to reach LONDON alone.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library