Decisions · 86236122
In re JJ206, LLC dba JuJu Joints
Serial No. 86236122 · Decided 2016-10-27 · Other
What happened
Registration refused — the Board found that JUJU JOINTS for marijuana vaporizers cannot be registered because the goods are illegal drug paraphernalia under federal law, and state marijuana legalization does not make the use lawful for federal trademark purposes.
The marks
Applicant
JUJU JOINTS
Smokeless marijuana or cannabis vaporizer apparatus; oral vaporizers for smokers (Class 34)
Other issues decided
Not du Pont factors. These are separate grounds the Board reached in this case.
| Issue | Weight | What the Board found |
|---|---|---|
| Lawfulness of Use Under CSA | Dispositive | The Board found that cannabis/marijuana vaporizing devices are drug paraphernalia under the federal Controlled Substances Act, making lawful use in commerce impossible regardless of state legalization. |
Why this decision is significant
Precedential decision extending In re Brown’s lawful use framework to cannabis paraphernalia and rejecting Cole Memo and state legalization arguments. Significant for any cannabis-related trademark application.
Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.
Related decisions
In re National Concessions Group, Inc.
The Board refused BAKKED for an ‘essential oil dispenser’ because the product is actually a cannabis dabbing tool — federal drug-paraphernalia law makes it unlawful in commerce, and…
87168058 · 2023-05-03 · BAKKED (standard characters)
In re National Concessions Group, Inc.
The Board refused the teardrop logo used on the same cannabis dabbing tool as the BAKKED word mark: because the product is federal drug paraphernalia, no federal trademark registration is…
87183434 · 2023-05-03 · Stylized drop design mark -- "The mark consists of two parallel curved lines forming a teardrop, being wrapped around a smaller solid teardrop." Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
In re Erik Brunetti
The Board affirmed the refusal to register FUCK (standard characters) for cell phone and laptop carrying cases, eyewear cases, spectacles and sunglasses, finding the word is such a…
88308426 · 2022-08-22 · FUCK (standard characters)
In re Erik Brunetti
The Board affirmed the refusal to register FUCK (standard characters) for jewelry, earrings, rings, bracelets, lapel pins, watches and watch accessories, finding that widespread third-party…
88308434 · 2022-08-22 · FUCK (standard characters)
The original record
Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.
Who checked this
Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.
Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.
General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.