Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 86079474

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Tapco International Corporation

Serial No. 86079474 · Decided 2017-04-28 · Other

What happened

The Board let Tapco’s application for KLEER TRIMBOARD move forward for cellular PVC lumber and exterior trim (fascia, soffits, corner boards and the like), finding that even though KLEER sounds like “clear,” no evidence showed buyers carry the knot-free “clear wood” meaning over to synthetic, non-wood products, so the name was not proven deceptive.

The marks

Applicant

KLEER TRIMBOARD

"Non-metal building products, namely, lumber made of manmade and synthetic materials, namely, cellular PVC; lumber of manmade and synthetic materials, namely, cellular PVC, for use as fascia, rakes, band boards, corner boards, frieze boards, casings, soffits; non-metal architectural mouldings and exterior finish trim of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC; non-metal decorative exterior mouldings and decorative exterior trim of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC, for use in building construction; building materials, namely, cellular PVC trim, none of the foregoing being composed of wood and all of the foregoing being exclusively composed of cellular PVC" in International Class 19

Why this decision is significant

Reversed alongside KLEER MOULDINGS in the precedential consolidated KLEER opinion on identical reasoning — no evidence consumers carry the knot-free ‘clear wood’ meaning to synthetic cellular-PVC lumber and trim. Shared rating across the three-application cluster.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library