Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 86078755

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Tapco International Corporation

Serial No. 86078755 · Decided 2017-04-28 · Other

What happened

The Board let Tapco’s application for KLEER MOULDINGS move forward for cellular PVC trim and mouldings, finding that even though KLEER sounds like “clear,” there was no evidence buyers attach the knot-free “clear wood” meaning to synthetic, non-wood building products, so the name was not proven deceptive.

The marks

Applicant

KLEER MOULDINGS

"Non-metal interior and exterior architectural mouldings and finish trim made of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC; non-metal decorative interior and exterior mouldings and decorative trim made of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC, for use in building construction; building products, namely, decorative interior and exterior cellular PVC trim, none of the foregoing being composed of wood and all of the foregoing being composed exclusively of cellular PVC" in International Class 19

Why this decision is significant

The reversed member of the precedential consolidated KLEER opinion: the Office must prove consumers actually attach the misdescribed ‘clear wood’ meaning to the goods at issue — lumber-grading evidence could not condemn KLEER for synthetic cellular-PVC mouldings. Shared rating across the three-application cluster.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library