Skip to content
Trademark Valet

Decisions · 88052194

PrecedentialNotableNo later change on its docket

In re Nursecon, LLC

Serial No. 88052194 · Decided 2024-12-26 · Other

What happened

The Board affirmed the refusal to register NURSECON for arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes, finding the mark merely descriptive because NURSE names the target audience, CON is a recognized abbreviation of conference or convention where the events are provided, and the combination adds no new meaning; it also upheld the USPTO’s cancellation of the registration that had inadvertently issued before the refusal could be made.

The marks

Applicant

NURSECON (standard characters)

Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes (International Class 41)

Why this decision is significant

Precedential decision confirming the USPTO’s inherent authority to cancel an inadvertently issued registration and restore the application to pendency for a clear-error refusal, even after publication and acceptance of a statement of use. Its descriptiveness holding also cements that -CON, as a recognized abbreviation of conference/convention, is descriptive when paired with an audience-identifying word, despite many Principal Register -CON registrations.

Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.

Related decisions

The original record

Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.

Open this case on TTABVUE, the Board's docket ↗


Who checked this

Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.

Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.

General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.

← Back to the library