Decisions · Expungement No. 2022-100138E (Reg. No. 5376466)
In re Locus Link USA
Expungement No. 2022-100138E (Reg. No. 5376466) · Decided 2024-07-01 · Other
What happened
Both SMARTLOCK trademark registrations were cancelled — the Board agreed with the USPTO that the registrations for “evaporative air coolers” were never actually used in commerce because the owner only used SMARTLOCK on connectors/fittings that go into cooling systems, not on finished evaporative air coolers themselves, so this Trademark Modernization Act expungement (cancellation for non-use) of both the standard-character registration (No. 5376466) and the stylized registration (No. 5376467) was affirmed.
The marks
Applicant
SMARTLOCK
"Components for air conditioning and cooling systems, namely, evaporative air coolers," in International Class 11
Why this decision is significant
Companion precedential TMA expungement appeal cancelling the standard-character SMARTLOCK registration on the same nonuse reasoning. Shared rating across the cluster.
Research significance is Trademark Valet's editorial rating of how useful a decision is to practitioners. It is not a statement of precedential weight — that is the separate Precedential field, which comes from the Board.
Related decisions
Both SMARTLOCK trademark registrations were cancelled
In re Locus Link USA
The Board agreed with the USPTO that the registrations for “evaporative air coolers” were never actually used in commerce because the owner only used SMARTLOCK on connectors/fittings that…
Expungement No. 2022-100137E (Reg. No. 5376467) · 2024-07-01 · SMARTLOCK
In re MK Diamond Products, Inc.
The Board upheld refusal to register the curved-cut-out shape on the edge of MK Diamond’s circular saw blades as a trademark, finding the curve serves a practical, functional purpose…
86813875 · 2020-07-27 · Product configuration mark consisting of a circular saw blade comprising the curved portion of a repeating slot design around the circumference of the goods (portions shown in broken lines are not part of the mark)
In re Olin Corporation
The Board upheld the refusal to register OLIN for industrial chemicals, finding that OLIN is primarily merely a surname and that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that the…
86651083 · 2017-09-22 · OLIN
In re Change Wind Corp.
The Board refused Change Wind Corp.'s application to register the three-dimensional shape of its vertical-axis wind turbine — four twisting wings straddling a cone-topped cylindrical tower…
86046590 · 2017-07-20 · Three-dimensional product configuration of a wind-powered turbine: four vertically extending turbine wings, obliquely curved in a twisting (helical) manner, straddling a vertically extending cylindrical base that tapers at its upper end into a truncated cone (design-only configuration mark; Section 2(f) claimed)
The original record
Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.
Who checked this
Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.
Provenance — Generated from database rows without re-reading the opinion.
General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.