Decisions · 85316199
In re Keep A Breast Foundation
85316199 · Decided 2017-08-17
What happened
Three of four refusal grounds affirmed for 3D breast/torso cast trade dress for breast cancer awareness services. (1) All specimens failed — original showed mark but no services; first substitute showed different casts with word mark identifiers rather than applied-for configuration; second substitute showed casts on table with no service association. (2) Mark fails to function as service mark — breast casts perceived as part of the educational and associational services rather than as source designator, especially where third parties offer similar breast casting services. (3) Acquired distinctiveness insufficient even arguendo — lack of uniformity in individually-molded casts, generalized financial data not tied to specific mark, third-party use undercuts substantial exclusivity, length of use alone insufficient for product form. Fourth ground (nondistinctive trade dress/ornamentation) not reached.
Related decisions
In re Aloe Bioscience, LLC
Genericness refusal REVERSED for ALOE BIOSCIENCE for aloe-containing dietary supplements, dermatologicals, pharmaceuticals, mouth/teeth preparations, and cosmeceuticals. Two-step H. Marvin…
85531266 · 2015-05-13
In re Meridian Rack & Pinion DBA buyautoparts.com
Genericness refusal affirmed for BUYAUTOPARTS.COM for on-line retail store services featuring auto parts. Applied H. Marvin Ginn two-step test. (1) Genus: on-line retail store services…
85504151 · 2015-04-21
In re Nieves & Nieves LLC
Both Section 2(a) and Section 2(c) refusals affirmed for ROYAL KATE for fashion/luxury goods. Board applied four-part Section 2(a) false suggestion test and found all prongs satisfied…
85179263 · 2015-01-30
In re Datapipe, Inc.
Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal affirmed for YOUR CLOUD (standard characters) for cloud computing and data storage services. Board analyzed each component: ‘Cloud’ is common…
85173828 · 2014-07-07
The original record
Read the opinion and every filing on the Board's own docket. The summary above is our paraphrase, not a quotation from the opinion. The opinion is the authority.
Who checked this
Not yet reviewed by an attorney. This summary is generated from coded data, and it says so until a lawyer has read it.
Provenance — Written from the opinion; research-significance tier confirmed.
General information about how trademark law works. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not make anyone your lawyer.